skip to main content

2017 STS Making and Doing Program

Meeting Home | Making & Doing Main | Making and Doing 2017 | Category: Policy Design and Planning STS Infrastructures

Construction Sets for DIY Medical Technologies and their Black Box Counterparts

Gomez-Marquez, Jose, MIT


Nikolas Albarran, MIT; Amy Moran-Thomas, MIT; Jose F Gomez-Marquez, MIT

The growing disparities in health resources, emergence of long tail medical devices to address orphan conditions and the demedicalization of a growing sectors of health devices is revealing and evolving patterns of DIY fabrication in healthcare settings around the world. This is exhibit will host an array of modern health technologies which feature a spectrum of access and disparities scores ranging from highly blackboxes devices, analog transparent designs, and health technology construction sets built for open ended reproducibility and community design. Interact with examples of “black box” medical technologies, such as proprietary rapid diagnostic tests and consumer fitness bands are driven by an array of propriety chemistry, mechanical design and closed software algorithms. Their combinations have led to disparity by design, such as the recent case of autoinjectors whose pharmaceutical components are commoditized active pharmaceutical ingredients wrapped in a closed hardware architecture. What are the implications of more hardware and more software creating proprietary boundaries on otherwise accessible solutions? How are healthcare providers and patients shifting their traditional role and learning to hack the technology back? What can we learn from transparent designs in medicine, such as stethoscopes and thermometers, undergoing digital transformations that create questions of access, affordability and data ownership rights? Our goal is to create a platform for discussion by demistyfing the technological drivers that convert transparent designs into closed ones; that may often create the illusion of enhanced care based on data creation; and widen the gap between designers and users. One experimental response the present situation is the diffusion of construction set methodology as a fabrication and design vehicle. Medical construction sets for health include an array of approaches that allow non-designers to create functional medical devices. Examples include Lego-like assay blocks that allow attendees to create their own rapid diagnostics, modularized digital health components that transform analog medical devices into “smart” transparent design devices, examples from hospital embedded makerspaces where nurses, doctors and patients are using tools such as 3-D printers, microcontrollers and hospital supplies to attend to just in time needs of patients. These are part of an ongoing approach to democratize medical fabrication that is highlighting policy implications for regulatory strategy, intellectual property, medical education and patient ethics.

Browse 2017 Projects

Alac: STS Olfactorium

Battles: The Trial Balloon: buoyancy, embodied media, and patchy planetarity

Callahan: Rethinking Citizen Science through doing Citizen Science

Cardoso Llach: Tracing Design Ecologies

Clement: Snowden Surveillance Archive

Cohen: Toward Improving Public Policy for Struct Engrg Design of Bridge, Transport & Marine Infrastructure

Durnova: Politicizing the scientific self through media interventions

Erickson-Davis: What it is to see: a simulation of artificial vision

Gluzman: Feminist Theory Theater

Gomez-Marquez: Construction Sets for DIY Medical Technologies and their Black Box Counterparts

Hidalgo: Collaborative Research Toolkit: a copyleft resource for the co-design of research processes

Hoagland: Getting a Sense of the Place: Navigating FemTechNet’s Critical Race and Ethnic Studies Workbook

Houston: Collaborative urban sensing with the “Dustbox” air quality monitor

Howell: Emotional Interpretation & Materiality of Biosensing

Johnson: Engineering Comes Home: Co-designing local infrastructure with residents of a London housing estate

Kennedy: Doing STS at the science/policy intersection

Knopes: Integrating STS into Bioethics and Medical Humanities Programs

Lachney: Generative STEM: Circulating Unalienated Value in Education, Labor and Environment

Lawson: (T)racing Eyes and Hearts:  An Installation to Explore the Physiology of Empathy

Lehr: Undergraduate STSers Learn by Doing in the Trump Era

Lippman: Making Sensible in 360°

Michails: AirTRACS: Community-based Air Quality Monitoring

Mogul: A STS STEM Education Incubator: The Co-Making of Inquiry

Mohsin: QEERI’s Science Majlis

Murphy: Environmental Data and Governance Initiative: Engaged STS Responding to the U.S.Administration

Nafus: Data Sense

Navarro: Our Driverless Futures: Speculating Moral Dilemmas of Self-Driving Cars

Nieusma: STS Design and Innovation: Disciplinary Discomfiture

Onaga: Biomaterial Matters: Fitting Humans into Cocoons, A Speculative Prototype

Ostman: STS approaches to public engagement with science: Synthetic biology

Ostrowski: The Empirical Printing Program

Perez Comisso: Technological theory for all: Teaching experiments on STS in Chile

Rosado Murillo: Pedal Transcriba, an Ethnographic Device of (and for) Qualitative Research

Shapiro: Detoxifying the environment across temporalities

Steensen: Face-off! Platform versus Self: A photobooth experiment

Stern: Zika and Feminist STS: Building a Network, Doing Collective Scholarship

Taylor: Connecting-Probing-Reflecting Spaces: The New England Workshop on Science and Social Change (NewSSC)

Terrell: The making of an undergraduate Sociotechnical Ethics Society

Wentworth: Handholds: making sense of bodies through slaughter

Wong: Design Workbook Variations: Exploring Biosensing Privacy Futures

Wylie: Making and Doing STS with Undergraduate Engineers: The UVA Approach