skip to main content

2017 STS Making and Doing Program

Meeting Home | Making & Doing Main | Making and Doing 2017 | Category: Policy Design and Planning STS Infrastructures

Environmental Data and Governance Initiative: Engaged STS Responding to the U.S.Administration

Murphy, Michelle, University Of Toronto


Sara Wylie, Northeastern University; Jerome Whitington; Joan Donovan, Data & Society Research Institute; Rebecca Lave, Indiana University Deparment Of Geography; Nick Shapiro

The Environmental Data and Governance Initiative (EDGI) is a grassroots network of nearly 90 composed of STS researchers, social and information scientists, natural and physical scientists, lawyers, and coders, as well as non-profit partners that formed in response to the Trump administration's hostile stances to existing federal environmental and energy policy, evidence and research, as well as to the scientific research infrastructure built to investigate, inform, and enforce environmental and climate regulations. Dismantling this infrastructure --which ranges from databases to satellites to models for climate, air, and water -- would imperil the public’s ability to know, the US’s government’s capacity for evidence-based governance, corporate accountability, and environmental protection. This Making and Doing Presentation shares EDGI’s projects and its efforts to create collective, open, engaged practices that bring social scientist and technology communities together to work fordata justice and environmental justice. EDGI began on Nov. 11th, 2016, just days after the election, as an email sent to 14 STS and environmental social scientists, and quickly grew into a larger network with three working groups: 1) The Archiving and technology working group, which organizes public events to collect and archive publicly available websites, documents, and datasets vulnerable to loss, as well as mobilizes and collaborates with social justice coding communities to build tools; 2) the Monitoring working group, which uses version tracking software, cloud computing, and EDGI-built tools to monitor changes to website language, information, and links of some 150 .gov domains, comprising tens of millions of web pages, and sharing findings with journalists, policymakers, and non-profits; and 3) the Capacity, Policy, and Finance group which conducts oral history interviews with federal agency staff members, tracks budget and regulatory changes, and uses FOIA requests to conduct research and collect non-public data. EDGI has collaborated with local communities across the US and Canada to create a grassroots movement of data archiving events with commitments to open access, open source, and collaboration involving thousands of local volunteers. By the time of the 4S meeting, we expect EDGI to have evolved further. This presentation will share EDGI’s evolving work, challenges, and practices, and invite the 4S community to become involved in and inform EDGI’s efforts. Beginning with a series of lightning talks outlining EDGI’s work to date, we will break out into small groups for targeted discussions on data activistism, the promises of public science, and tactical responses to federal science and environmental stances. From there, we will hold a series of demos showcasing how to use the tools and techniques developed by EDGI to meet the challenges identified in the small group discussions. We will conclude with a moderated discussion on how to organize a networked community in your area. This presentation will be conducted by a group of EDGI members.

  • LinkedIn

Browse 2017 Projects

Alac: STS Olfactorium

Battles: The Trial Balloon: buoyancy, embodied media, and patchy planetarity

Callahan: Rethinking Citizen Science through doing Citizen Science

Cardoso Llach: Tracing Design Ecologies

Clement: Snowden Surveillance Archive

Cohen: Toward Improving Public Policy for Struct Engrg Design of Bridge, Transport & Marine Infrastructure

Durnova: Politicizing the scientific self through media interventions

Erickson-Davis: What it is to see: a simulation of artificial vision

Gluzman: Feminist Theory Theater

Gomez-Marquez: Construction Sets for DIY Medical Technologies and their Black Box Counterparts

Hidalgo: Collaborative Research Toolkit: a copyleft resource for the co-design of research processes

Hoagland: Getting a Sense of the Place: Navigating FemTechNet’s Critical Race and Ethnic Studies Workbook

Houston: Collaborative urban sensing with the “Dustbox” air quality monitor

Howell: Emotional Interpretation & Materiality of Biosensing

Johnson: Engineering Comes Home: Co-designing local infrastructure with residents of a London housing estate

Kennedy: Doing STS at the science/policy intersection

Knopes: Integrating STS into Bioethics and Medical Humanities Programs

Lachney: Generative STEM: Circulating Unalienated Value in Education, Labor and Environment

Lawson: (T)racing Eyes and Hearts:  An Installation to Explore the Physiology of Empathy

Lehr: Undergraduate STSers Learn by Doing in the Trump Era

Lippman: Making Sensible in 360°

Michails: AirTRACS: Community-based Air Quality Monitoring

Mogul: A STS STEM Education Incubator: The Co-Making of Inquiry

Mohsin: QEERI’s Science Majlis

Murphy: Environmental Data and Governance Initiative: Engaged STS Responding to the U.S.Administration

Nafus: Data Sense

Navarro: Our Driverless Futures: Speculating Moral Dilemmas of Self-Driving Cars

Nieusma: STS Design and Innovation: Disciplinary Discomfiture

Onaga: Biomaterial Matters: Fitting Humans into Cocoons, A Speculative Prototype

Ostman: STS approaches to public engagement with science: Synthetic biology

Ostrowski: The Empirical Printing Program

Perez Comisso: Technological theory for all: Teaching experiments on STS in Chile

Rosado Murillo: Pedal Transcriba, an Ethnographic Device of (and for) Qualitative Research

Shapiro: Detoxifying the environment across temporalities

Steensen: Face-off! Platform versus Self: A photobooth experiment

Stern: Zika and Feminist STS: Building a Network, Doing Collective Scholarship

Taylor: Connecting-Probing-Reflecting Spaces: The New England Workshop on Science and Social Change (NewSSC)

Terrell: The making of an undergraduate Sociotechnical Ethics Society

Wentworth: Handholds: making sense of bodies through slaughter

Wong: Design Workbook Variations: Exploring Biosensing Privacy Futures

Wylie: Making and Doing STS with Undergraduate Engineers: The UVA Approach