skip to main content

2017 STS Making and Doing Program

Meeting Home | Making & Doing Main | Making and Doing 2017 | Category: Visual and Sensory Approaches Pedagogy

Face-off! Platform versus Self: A photobooth experiment

Steensen, Marie, Aarhus University, Denmark

Co-Authors:

Annette Markham, Aarhus University Center for STS; Mette Hegaard, Aarhus University, Centre for STS-studies; Maria Thing Nielsen, Aarhus University, Centre for STS-studies; Lydia Choi, Aarhus University, Centre for STS-studies; Julie Bredholt, Aarhus University, Digital Living Research Commence; Jette Mia Johansen, Aarhus University, Information Studies, Digital Living

In this photo booth installation, we encourage conference participants to playfully engage with the sociotechnical relation of self / platform. . We seek to deconstruct and playfully reconstruct possible sensemaking processes involved in negotiating self-categorization. The experiment serves as an interactive way to explore the continual and precarious dynamic of agential relation among elements of socio-technical design. Our underlying goal is to critically question how platforms interact with users to construct identity-for-self and identity-for-others (Jenkins, 2000). This is part of a longer series of exhibitions and interventions coming out of Aarhus University’s Future Making project (Markham, 2017). In these interventions, we explore creative and transgressive approaches to scientific and humanistic methods understanding socio-technical relations and the processes of making future memories and cultural heritage within larger systems of autonomous or self-learning social media infrastructures. Through the photobooth installation/experiment, we resist typical “talk about it” sessions, but still generate reflexive insights on categorization in a digital era, where much of our online identity is pre-categorized by platforms. 2) SETUP Phase 1: Generating photos of 4S participants conference participants through a photobooth. The photobooth will be available for everyone to use during the doing and making sessions, throughout the conference (or as scheduled). Participants take a photo of themselves in the photobooth and are given particular options by the system to either choose from predefined categories or invent creative categories. This simple setup functions as a cultural prompt for participants to investigate the social construction of identity within the politics of platform defaults (van Dijck, 2013). Phase 2: Collecting immediate insights and reflections from 4S participants. We will conduct a series of micro-interviews with the participants when they emerge from the photobooth, to help us think about the experiences of participants and to give participants a chance to reflect on the experience through a few key question prompts from us. References: Foucault, M. (1976) [1980]. The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge, vol. 1. London: Penguin. Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. UCPress. Jenkins, R. (2000). Categorization: Identity, Social Process and Epistemology. Current Sociology, 48, 7-25. Losh, E. (2015). Feminism Reads Big Data: “Social Physics,” Atomism, and Selfiecity. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1647-59. Manovich, L. (2014). Selfiecity. http://selfiecity.net Markham, A. (2017). Future Making. Blog. http://futuremaking.space/ Van Dijck, J. (2013). The Culture of Connectivity. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • LinkedIn

Browse 2017 Projects

Alac: STS Olfactorium

Battles: The Trial Balloon: buoyancy, embodied media, and patchy planetarity

Callahan: Rethinking Citizen Science through doing Citizen Science

Cardoso Llach: Tracing Design Ecologies

Clement: Snowden Surveillance Archive

Cohen: Toward Improving Public Policy for Struct Engrg Design of Bridge, Transport & Marine Infrastructure

Durnova: Politicizing the scientific self through media interventions

Erickson-Davis: What it is to see: a simulation of artificial vision

Gluzman: Feminist Theory Theater

Gomez-Marquez: Construction Sets for DIY Medical Technologies and their Black Box Counterparts

Hidalgo: Collaborative Research Toolkit: a copyleft resource for the co-design of research processes

Hoagland: Getting a Sense of the Place: Navigating FemTechNet’s Critical Race and Ethnic Studies Workbook

Houston: Collaborative urban sensing with the “Dustbox” air quality monitor

Howell: Emotional Interpretation & Materiality of Biosensing

Johnson: Engineering Comes Home: Co-designing local infrastructure with residents of a London housing estate

Kennedy: Doing STS at the science/policy intersection

Knopes: Integrating STS into Bioethics and Medical Humanities Programs

Lachney: Generative STEM: Circulating Unalienated Value in Education, Labor and Environment

Lawson: (T)racing Eyes and Hearts:  An Installation to Explore the Physiology of Empathy

Lehr: Undergraduate STSers Learn by Doing in the Trump Era

Lippman: Making Sensible in 360°

Michails: AirTRACS: Community-based Air Quality Monitoring

Mogul: A STS STEM Education Incubator: The Co-Making of Inquiry

Mohsin: QEERI’s Science Majlis

Murphy: Environmental Data and Governance Initiative: Engaged STS Responding to the U.S.Administration

Nafus: Data Sense

Navarro: Our Driverless Futures: Speculating Moral Dilemmas of Self-Driving Cars

Nieusma: STS Design and Innovation: Disciplinary Discomfiture

Onaga: Biomaterial Matters: Fitting Humans into Cocoons, A Speculative Prototype

Ostman: STS approaches to public engagement with science: Synthetic biology

Ostrowski: The Empirical Printing Program

Perez Comisso: Technological theory for all: Teaching experiments on STS in Chile

Rosado Murillo: Pedal Transcriba, an Ethnographic Device of (and for) Qualitative Research

Shapiro: Detoxifying the environment across temporalities

Steensen: Face-off! Platform versus Self: A photobooth experiment

Stern: Zika and Feminist STS: Building a Network, Doing Collective Scholarship

Taylor: Connecting-Probing-Reflecting Spaces: The New England Workshop on Science and Social Change (NewSSC)

Terrell: The making of an undergraduate Sociotechnical Ethics Society

Wentworth: Handholds: making sense of bodies through slaughter

Wong: Design Workbook Variations: Exploring Biosensing Privacy Futures

Wylie: Making and Doing STS with Undergraduate Engineers: The UVA Approach