skip to main content

2017 STS Making and Doing Program

Meeting Home | Making & Doing Main | Making and Doing 2017 | Category: Pedagogy

STS approaches to public engagement with science: Synthetic biology

Ostman, Rae, Arizona State University


Ira Bennett, Arizona State University; Stephanie Long, Science Museum of Minnesota; David Sittenfeld, Museum of Science; Jameson Wetmore, Arizona State University

This presentation will share STS approaches to engaging public audiences and scientists in conversations about emerging technologies, focusing on several related projects that consider synthetic biology. These projects share a common, overarching objective to change the way we as a society think, learn, and talk about science and technology.

The Frankenstein Bicentennial Project is developing a suite of transmedia learning experiences that explore synthetic biology and other technologies, including an alternate reality game, creative making activities, and online challenges. The project is studying learning in a transmedia environment and investigating the way different experiences contribute to learners’ sense of self-efficacy related to STS ideas. Over 50 organizations will organize events in January, 2018 to coincide the 200th anniversary of the publication of Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein, which will feature these transmedia experiences. The Frankenstein transmedia project is funded by NSF.

Storming the Castle is an interactive museum theatre program that considers the possible promises and perils of synthetic biology. This comedy uses the Frankenstein story to raise questions about responsible innovation. Project evaluation considered how museum theatre encourages learning and complements other types of experiences typically offered by science museums. Storming the Castle is funded by IMLS. Building with Biology brings scientists and public audiences together in conversations and hands-on activities about synthetic biology and the ways it is interconnected with society.

Building with Biology resource kits were distributed and used by 200 science museums and universities in events held in 2016. Building with Biology forum programs, “Should We Engineer the Mosquito?” and “Should We Edit the Genome?,” were held at around 40 locations. Project evaluation examines the impact of these experiences on both public and scientist participants. Building with Biology is funded by NSF.

These projects are part of a longstanding collaboration among faculty at the School for the Future of Innovation in Society (SFIS) at Arizona State University and staff at science museums that are part of the National Informal STEM Education Network (NISE Net). The mission of SFIS is to cultivate and extend the ideas that: 1) Innovation is a complex process in which social and technical actions and considerations continually interact to create similarly complex, real-world outcomes; 2) The usefulness and even the validity of knowledge relevant to human problem-solving reflect social context and may arise from multiple sources and perspectives; and 3) The processes of creating knowledge and building more desirable futures need to be more interdisciplinary, more anticipatory, and more democratic. NISE Net is a community of informal educators and scientists dedicated to supporting learning about science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) across the United States. The Network achieves its reach and impact through the participation of around 600 partner organizations in Network projects and activities.

The presentation at 4S will include: hands-on and forum activities from Building with Biology; making activities and the alternate reality game from Frankenstein; and a videotaped version of Storming the Castle. The presenters will also share research and evaluation findings related to public learning of STS ideas.

  • LinkedIn

Browse 2017 Projects

Alac: STS Olfactorium

Battles: The Trial Balloon: buoyancy, embodied media, and patchy planetarity

Callahan: Rethinking Citizen Science through doing Citizen Science

Cardoso Llach: Tracing Design Ecologies

Clement: Snowden Surveillance Archive

Cohen: Toward Improving Public Policy for Struct Engrg Design of Bridge, Transport & Marine Infrastructure

Durnova: Politicizing the scientific self through media interventions

Erickson-Davis: What it is to see: a simulation of artificial vision

Gluzman: Feminist Theory Theater

Gomez-Marquez: Construction Sets for DIY Medical Technologies and their Black Box Counterparts

Hidalgo: Collaborative Research Toolkit: a copyleft resource for the co-design of research processes

Hoagland: Getting a Sense of the Place: Navigating FemTechNet’s Critical Race and Ethnic Studies Workbook

Houston: Collaborative urban sensing with the “Dustbox” air quality monitor

Howell: Emotional Interpretation & Materiality of Biosensing

Johnson: Engineering Comes Home: Co-designing local infrastructure with residents of a London housing estate

Kennedy: Doing STS at the science/policy intersection

Knopes: Integrating STS into Bioethics and Medical Humanities Programs

Lachney: Generative STEM: Circulating Unalienated Value in Education, Labor and Environment

Lawson: (T)racing Eyes and Hearts:  An Installation to Explore the Physiology of Empathy

Lehr: Undergraduate STSers Learn by Doing in the Trump Era

Lippman: Making Sensible in 360°

Michails: AirTRACS: Community-based Air Quality Monitoring

Mogul: A STS STEM Education Incubator: The Co-Making of Inquiry

Mohsin: QEERI’s Science Majlis

Murphy: Environmental Data and Governance Initiative: Engaged STS Responding to the U.S.Administration

Nafus: Data Sense

Navarro: Our Driverless Futures: Speculating Moral Dilemmas of Self-Driving Cars

Nieusma: STS Design and Innovation: Disciplinary Discomfiture

Onaga: Biomaterial Matters: Fitting Humans into Cocoons, A Speculative Prototype

Ostman: STS approaches to public engagement with science: Synthetic biology

Ostrowski: The Empirical Printing Program

Perez Comisso: Technological theory for all: Teaching experiments on STS in Chile

Rosado Murillo: Pedal Transcriba, an Ethnographic Device of (and for) Qualitative Research

Shapiro: Detoxifying the environment across temporalities

Steensen: Face-off! Platform versus Self: A photobooth experiment

Stern: Zika and Feminist STS: Building a Network, Doing Collective Scholarship

Taylor: Connecting-Probing-Reflecting Spaces: The New England Workshop on Science and Social Change (NewSSC)

Terrell: The making of an undergraduate Sociotechnical Ethics Society

Wentworth: Handholds: making sense of bodies through slaughter

Wong: Design Workbook Variations: Exploring Biosensing Privacy Futures

Wylie: Making and Doing STS with Undergraduate Engineers: The UVA Approach